Article 8726 of misc.health.alternative:
From: t…@sw.stratus.com (Tarl Neustaedter)
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -
>[Massive cross-posting modified to follow into one group]
>In article <CBs2y6….@newsflash.concordia.ca>, grog…@cs.concordia.ca (Peter Grogono) writes:
>>> [scientific medicine vs alternative, astronomy replacing astrology]
>> There are several rather doubtful arguments here. Has astronomy "well and truly
>> replaced astrology"? There are more astrologers than astronomers; the best
>As an amateur astronomer, the concept of astrology competing with astronomy
>in today’s world rather takes my breath away.
>But the more I think about it, the analogy with alternative medicine is
>exact, and I thank you for pointing it out to me. It is an analogy I will
>>keep in mind for future discussions on alternative medicine. Both astrology
>and alternative medicines are systems of belief which rely on tradition
>rather than investigation, and are unfriendly to objective analysis.
>Astronomy and Medicine have historical roots in the older "disciplines",
>but have diffentiated themselves by attempting to measure, quantify, explain
>and predict behaviour in their fields of study. This has led them in far
>different directions than they started out from. In both fields (like all
>science), the sole standard of validity is how reliable and accurate the
>predictions are. In the predecessor fields, different standards apply, and
>thus don’t qualify as science.
There have been many studies performed by the medical community on
different aspects of alternative medicine. Fortunately, there are
many open-minded people in the medical community who are performing
experiments on remidies that have been around for thousands of years
rather than simply lumping it all together as quackery. It seems
fairly unscientific to jump to such conclusions.
I take solice in the fact that more and more hospitals are opening up
wellness clinics and giving classes in natural foods, meditation, yoga,
breathing techniques. As has already been mentioned several large
pharmaceutical firms are already spending big bucks investigating how
and why certain herbs work. Accupuncture and biofeedback has been
used in the U.S. medical community. Over the last 15 years, I have
literally met thousands of people who have been helped tremendously
by alternative medicine. (Of course, you might say "duped".) More
and more people are giving up on symptom-relieving drugs produced by
drug companies and finding success with alternative medicine. Just today,
there was a five-hour, five-part TV series on alternative medicine
hosted by Bill Moyers. Many of the people involved are well-known
scientists in the modern medical community. I heard today that
Dean Ornish’s alternative medicine program to reverse heart disease
was recently accepted by a major insurance carrier as a legitamite
treatment.
I don’t know about the rest of you, but I don’t plan to wait for
alternative remedies to be proven by the medical community to be
helpful and safe before I use or recommend such remedies.
Attempting to debunk alternative medicine by linking it to astrology
(which many scientists consider laugable at best) may be considered
by many people an insult to their intelligence. Linking alternative
medicine to a field that many people don’t believe in doesn’t prove anything
except that the person doing the linking hasn’t (or can’t) given any
legitamite arguments against studying the viability of alternative
medicine.
>If we get a sci.med.alternative, I’ll feel compelled to propose
>sci.astro.astrology and sci.physics.flat-earth.
How about:
sci.med.close-minded
or
sci.med.if_the_doctor_doesn’t_know_nobody_else_could_possibly_know_either
– Mark